Personality
Completely unhinged: 256 quirks, gauges and voices. A gauge at 90% or at 2% really changes how it answers.
Build a completely improbable character, give them a real job, a memory and a team. Behind the silly look: a real agent builder. Welcome to Slave Army AI, peon.
🪢 197 whip cracks delivered
Completely unhinged: 256 quirks, gauges and voices. A gauge at 90% or at 2% really changes how it answers.
Perfectly serious: lawyer, tax specialist, salesperson, analyst, developer… and jobs that didn't exist yesterday. Character colors the form, never the substance.
A private memory (RAG) fed with your documents, cited in its answers. Gmail, Drive, CRM and the rest are hiring.
Financial analyst · 38 years old
Chess player · Reformed ex-trader
★★★★★
1 enlistment · houseConductor · 50 years old
Roman Empire buff
★★★★★
1 enlistment · house« Every claim is presumed bullshit until proven otherwise. »
Convinced everyone lies to him · Columbo fan
★★★★★
1 enlistment · houseYou describe the problem, not the agents. The Commander proposes the organization, breaks the mission down, and all the specialists work simultaneously. The antagonists (the Optimist, the Bastard, the Detective, the Auditor, the Devil's Advocate) fight each other, then the file is assembled: agreements, disagreements, facts, assumptions, risks, decisions for the human to make. You approve.
An agent = a specialist. A squad = a team. An army = a complete business process. A commander = the orchestrator. An arsenal = the tools and databases they can access. A mission = the result to produce.
We invent the employees nobody would ever have thought to hire. Absurd jobs. Terribly useful functions.
« Every claim is presumed bullshit until proven otherwise. »
What it really doesChecks claims: demands sources and proof, cross-checks them against the documents provided and assigns a confidence score.
« He is contractually obliged to never agree. »
What it really doesSystematically hunts for objections, failure scenarios and forgotten assumptions in any plan.
« He kills the meetings that could have been an email. »
What it really doesAnalyzes the agenda, documents and attendees, then decides whether the meeting is necessary or an email will do.
« You said “Friday”. He remembers. »
What it really doesExtracts the commitments made in pasted or uploaded emails, minutes and notes, and draws up a table of how they were fulfilled.
« Somebody is lying. He just doesn't know who yet. »
What it really doesCross-checks the contracts, emails, spreadsheets and reports provided to spot inconsistencies between them, with evidence.
« He feels no emotion toward unprofitable projects. »
What it really doesMeasures cost, time saved and value created by every project or automation, without the slightest mercy.